×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Nancy Jean Doig

Not yet reviewed

1201 K Street Suite 1100, Sacramento, CA 95814-3938

Litigation, Proposition 65, Public Law and 2 more

About Nancy Jean Doig

Nancy Jean Doig is a lawyer practicing litigation, proposition 65, public law and 2 other areas of law. Nancy received a degree from University of California, Berkeley Southwestern Law School Boalt Hall, Berkeley CA, and has been licensed for 23 years. Nancy practices in Sacramento, CA.

Reviews for Nancy

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Finance 1
    • Project Finance
  • Other 3
    • Proposition 65
    • Public Law
    • Energy & Utilities

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Off. of the Atty. Gen.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2003, California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
    Memberships
    American Bar Association.

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California at Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law
    Class of 2003
    JD - Juris Doctor
    Other Education
    University of California, Berkeley Southwestern Law School Boalt Hall, Berkeley CA

    Lancaster University, England

    Women's Studies, University of California at San Diego
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1975
    La Mesa, California, 1975

Nancy Jean Doig

Off. of the Atty. Gen.
Not yet reviewed

1201 K Street Suite 1100Sacramento, CA 95814-3938U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Timothy M. Weir
Pro
Timothy M. Weir
5.0
8
Litigation lawyer
279-255-0034
View Profile
Larry C. Larsen
Pro
Larry C. Larsen
4.5
4
Litigation lawyer
279-895-2763
View Profile
Derek Charles Decker
Pro
Derek Charles Decker
3.9
8
Litigation lawyer
279-241-0845
View Profile
David P. Mastagni
Pro
David P. Mastagni
5.0
1
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

279-260-5458
View Profile
Glen C. Hansen
Pro
Glen C. Hansen
4.6
12
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

279-260-9054
View Profile

Email Nancy Jean Doig

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions