|
|
Address
230 Newport Center Drive, Suite 120
Newport Beach, California 92660 (Orange Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticePractice Limited to Family Law Litigation. Year Established: 1972
Firm Size: 1
Richard M. Shack (Member) born Newark, New Jersey, December 22, 1942; admitted to bar, 1972, California and U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1975, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Southern California (A.B., 1964); Western State University (J.D., 1970). Author: "Mediation of Child Custody and Visitation Disputes in Orange County," Fifth and Sixth Annual Child Custody Colloquium, Los Angeles, California, 1982-1983. Lecturer: "Representing Parents and Children in Custody Proceedings," California Continuing Education of the Bar, 1986. Lecturer: "Child Custody-Fantasy and Realism," National Business Institute, 1992; Move Away Cases, Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Jan. 1994. Lecturer: "Family Law Trial Skills Workshop Evidence In Action," Orange County Bar Association May 2005. Seminar Chairman: 8th Annual Family Law Seminar, Orange County Trial Lawyers Association; Second Family Law Clinic, Orange County Bar Association, 1982. Judge Pro Tem, Orange County Superior Court, 1983. Member: Orange County Bar Association (Secretary, 1986, and President, 1987, Family Law Section); State Bar of California (Member, Family Law Section; Examiner, Disciplinary Proceedings, 1974). (Certified Specialist, Family Law, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization). Reported Cases: In re Marriage of S. (1985) 171CA3d 738 217 CR 561; In re Marriage of Hopwood (1989) 214CA3d 1604 263 CR 401. Practice Areas: Practice Limited to Family Law Litigation; Child Custody; Child Support; Marital Property Settlements.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|