×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Raymond Kei-Ning Chan

Raymond Kei-Ning Chan

Not yet reviewed

12544 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92130

Intellectual Property, Litigation, Intellectual Property, Patent Prosecution and Counseling and 3 more

About Raymond Kei-Ning Chan

Raymond Kei-Ning Chan is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, litigation, intellectual property, patent prosecution and counseling and 3 other areas of law. Raymond received a BS degree from University of California, Los Angeles, and has been licensed for 24 years. Raymond practices at Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP in San Diego, CA.

Raymond Kei-Ning Chan (San Diego, California)

Reviews for Raymond

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 2
    • Patent Prosecution and Counseling
    • Trade Secrets
  • Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Litigation, Intellectual Property
    • Asia-Pacific Cross-Border

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Cantonese
    M
    arin
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters
    Represents a global chemical products company in patent infringement matter involving the company's patents on flame retardant polyester artificial hair fibers. Represented a global chemical products company in ITC Section 337 Investigation relating to infringement of the company's patents on polyimide films
    their manufacturing. Defended automotive wheel retailer against design patent infringement claims asserted by dominant competitor with extensive design patent portfolio. Defended Internet service provider against leading global fashion house asserting claims of contributory copyright
    trademark infringement for unwitting provision of webhosting services to third party counterfeiters. Defended distributor of fireplace lighters against industry leader asserting claims of willful infringement of its utility patents on m
    atory safety mechanisms. Represented leading automotive aftermarket part
    accessory distributor in design patent, trade dress,
    trademark disputes with its competitors. Represented leading manufacturer of golf grips in patent infringement case against mass-market competitor.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2002, California
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Fordham University School of Law
    JD
    Other Education
    University of California, Los Angeles
    BS
    Biochemistry

Raymond Kei-Ning Chan

Partner at Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
Not yet reviewed

12544 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400San Diego, CA 92130U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Samuel Eugene Spital
Pro
Samuel Eugene Spital
5.0
286
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

858-828-3146
View Profile
Roy L. Carlson, Jr.
Pro
Roy L. Carlson, Jr.
5.0
1
Intellectual Property lawyer
858-381-9715
View Profile
Lisa J. Damiani
Pro
Lisa J. Damiani
4.8
29
Intellectual Property lawyer
858-667-5854
View Profile
Thomas E. Jurgensen
Pro
Thomas E. Jurgensen
4.0
1
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

720-983-2012
View Profile
Dorn G. Bishop
Pro
Dorn G. Bishop
5.0
3
Intellectual Property lawyer
858-339-2618
View Profile

Email Raymond Kei-Ning Chan

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions