|
|
Address
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2250
Los Angeles, California 90067 (Los Angeles Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Kollender & Sargoy strives to provide the highest quality representation in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible. The fee structure generally results in costs below those of larger Los Angeles firms. In business transactions, the firm offers the cautious eye of the litigator combined with the knowledge and experience of seasoned business professionals. The firm has the reputation in the legal community as being effective, no-nonsense litigators, a reputation of which we are justly proud. Statement of PracticeCivil, Business, Probate and Tax Litigation, IRS Dispute Resolution, IRS Audits, Employment Counseling and Litigation, Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Wrongful Termination, Employment Contracts, Corporate, Business Planning, Business Formation, Contracts, Business Litigation, Family, Divorce, Personal Injury, Nursing Home Abuse, White Collar Criminal Defense, Estate Planning, Wills and Probate. Year Established: 1992
Firm Size: 2
Address2049 Century Park East, Suite 2250 Los Angeles, CA 90067, (Los Angeles Co.)
PhonePhone: 310-277-7737 Facsimile: 310-277-7250 Email: kjsarglaw@aol.com

Website http://www.kandslaw.com
MEMBERS OF FIRMRobert M. Kollender (Member) born New York, New York, November 21, 1949; admitted to bar, 1977, California; 1979, U.S. District Court, Central District of California and U.S. Tax Court. Education: Northeastern University (B.A., with honors in Economics, 1972); Pepperdine University (J.D., 1976); Georgetown University Law Center (LL.M. in Taxation, 1977). United States Treasury Department, 1972-1973. Member: Los Angeles County Bar Association; State Bar of California. Practice Areas: Estate Planning; Business Planning/Corporate; IRS Dispute Matters/Tax Litigation; Trust/Estate/Probate Litigation; Undue Influence; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Financial Elder Abuse; General Civil Litigation (Business/Contract Matters).Email: Robert M. Kollender
Kenneth J. Sargoy (Member) admitted to bar, 1981, California, U.S. District Court, Central District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1990, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California. Education: New York University; New School for Social Research (B.A., 1971); Whittier College School of Law (J.D., 1981). Recipient, Neil Deitch Scholarship. Notes and Comments Editor, Whittier Law Review, 1980-1981. Extern to the Honorable William P. Gray, United States District Judge, 1981. Author: "Overcoming Discovery Obstacles"; Case Note, "Toward A New Concept of Privacy: Pretrial Detainees Have The Constitutional Right To Be Free From Covert Electronic Surveillance In Jail - De Lancie v. Superior Court," 2 Whittier L. Rev. 619 (1980). Co-Author: "Restricting Terminations Of Employees For Free Speech Expressions," 5 Labor and Employment Law Quarterly 11 (Fall/1986); "Intentional Interference With Contractual Relations: When Are Managers Liable For Terminating Employees?" 6 California Labor and Employment Law Quarterly 11 (Winter/1988). Lecturer: Employment Law, State Bar of California. Member: Los Angeles County Bar Association; State Bar of California. Practice Areas: Business Litigation; Employment Counseling and Litigation; Family Law Litigation; Personal Injury Litigation; Criminal Law.Email: Kenneth J. Sargoy
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peers
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|