|
|
Address
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900
Beverly Hills, California 90212 (Los Angeles Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) The firm has achieved the highest rating endorsed by Martindale-Hubbell. Statement of PracticeCommercial Litigation and Transactions, Real Estate, Entertainment, Employment Law, Financing and Litigation, Loan Workouts, Contracts, Corporate Formation, Acquisitions, Mergers, Sexual Harassment, Wrongful Termination, Personal Injury, Defamation, Libel, Slander, Intellectual Property Rights and Litigation, Business Litigation, State and Federal Civil Trials; Corporate Law, Family Law, Divorce, Insurance Bad Faith, Legal Malpractice, Medical Malpractice, Products Liability. Firm Size: 5
Address9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900 Beverly Hills, CA 90212, (Los Angeles Co.)
PhonePhone: 310-246-0321 Facsimile: 310-246-0305

Website http://www.smnlawfirm.com
Richard Lloyd Sherman (Managing Partner) born Freeport, New York, March 16, 1957; admitted to bar, 1982, California; U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit and U.S. District Court, Central, Northern, Southern and Eastern Districts of California; 1993, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Education: University of Southern California (B.A., summa cum laude, 1979); University of California at Los Angeles (J.D., 1982). Phi Beta Kappa; Phi Kappa Phi. Member: UCLA-Alaska Law Review, 1981-1982; UCLA Moot Court Honors Program. Chief Justice, USC Judicial Council. Member: Los Angeles County Bar Association; State Bar of California. Reported Cases: Davidov cite; 78 Cal. App. 4th 597, 2000; Brumfield v. Death Row Records et al (8th largest punitive damage award in California during 2000); Marra v. Mission Foods; Mike Davidov Co. v. Issod. (re: punitive damages) Practice Areas: Business Litigation; Real Estate Litigation; Sports Law; International Law; Contracts; Entertainment Law; Trademark; Copyright; Intellectual Property; Corporate Law; Employment Law; Wrongful Termination; Sexual Harassment; Landlord and Tenant Law; Real Estate; International Trade; Personal Injury; Business Torts; Labor Law; Civil Rights; Defamation; Libel and Slander.Email: Richard Lloyd Sherman
Ken Nathanson (Member) born Los Angeles, California, July 31, 1951; admitted to bar, 1977, California; 1978, U.S. District Court, Central and Northern Districts of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Education: Claremont Men's College (B.A., 1973); Whittier College School of Law (J.D., 1977). Member: Los Angeles County Bar Association; State Bar of California. Reported Cases: Sade Shoe Company, Inc. v. Oschin & Snyder et al, 217 Cal. App. 3d 1509, 1990; Ted Orden v. Crawshaw Mortgage & Investment Company, Inc., 109 Cal. App. 3d 141, 1980. Practice Areas: Real Estate; Commercial Law; Contracts; Real Estate Litigation; Business Litigation; Family Law; Divorce; Business Transactions; Usury.Email: Ken Nathanson
——————————Abhay Khosla (Associate)
Sheila Kadisha (Associate)
Maria Hall (Associate)
Ratings Methodology
1Total Number of Reviews 100%% Recommended: Feb 14, 2009 Date of Last Client Review: The following firm members have been rated by their peers
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|