|
|
Address
381 Bayside Road, P.O. Box 1109
Arcata, California 95521-6497 (Humboldt Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.6
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeReal Estate, Construction, Business and General Civil Litigation, Probate and Estate Planning, Business, Taxation, Family, Administrative Law. Year Established: 1948
Firm Size: 4
Address381 Bayside Road P.O. Box 1109
Arcata, CA 95521-6497, (Humboldt Co.)
PhonePhone: 707-822-1771
Fax: 707-822-1901
Website
http://www.arcateurekalaw.com
John R. Stokes (1917-2001).
Dorothy L. Steeves (1926-1996).
Thomas Dean Rowe (Member) born Los Angeles, California, April 26, 1948; admitted to bar, 1985, California and U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 2001, U.S. Tax Court.. Education: University of California at Santa Cruz (B.A., 1970); Humboldt State University; Hastings College of the Law (J.D., 1985). Certified Public Accountant, California, 1977. Senior Tax Manager, CPA/Consulting Firm of Coopers & Lybrand, 1985-1990. Member: Humboldt County Bar Association; State Bar of California (Member: Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation, 1997-2000; Executive Committee, Tax Section, 2000-2003). Special Agencies: California Commission on Aging (appointed 2006); Humboldt County Assessment Appeals Board (appointed 2008). Practice Areas: Estate Planning and Probate Law; Business Law; Taxation Law.Email: Thomas Dean Rowe
John R. Stokes, III (Member) born Berkeley, California, June 3, 1948; admitted to bar, 1975, California; 1985, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Education: University of California at Berkeley (A.B., 1971); University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law (J.D., 1975). Deputy District Attorney, County of Humboldt, 1982-1992. Member: Humboldt County Bar Association; State Bar of California. Reported Cases: In re: Marriage of Hamer (2000) 81 Cal App 4th 712; Marriage of Henderson (1990) 225 Cal App 3d 531; County of Humboldt v. Harris (1988) 206 Cal App 3d 857. Practice Areas: Family Law; Probate; General Practice.Email: John R. Stokes, III
Chris Carol Hamer (Member) born Eureka, California, December 25, 1955; admitted to bar, 1982, California; 1983, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California and U.S. Tax Court; 1994, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 2004, Yurok Tribal Court; 2008, Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court. Education: University of California at Santa Barbara (B.A., magna cum laude, 1978); Georgetown University (J.D., cum laude, 1982). Member: Humboldt County Bar Association. Reported Cases: Westhaven Community Dev. v. County of Humboldt, et al (1998) 61 Cal App 4th 365. Practice Areas: Construction Litigation; Real Property and Real Property Litigation; Probate Litigation; Water Rights and Water Litigation; Business Litigation.Email: Chris Carol Hamer
Joshua R. Kaufman (Member) born Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, September 14, 1951; admitted to bar, 2003, California and U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Education: University of California, Berkeley (B.A., 1975); Law Office Study, Law Office of William Bertain and Law Office of Steven Schectman (1998-2002). Member: Humboldt County Bar Association; State Bar of California. Practice Areas: Business Law; Construction Law; Probate; Real Estate; Estate Planning.Email: Joshua R. Kaufman
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|