|
|
Address
SGA Corporate Center
16100 N. 71st Street, Suite 190
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 (Maricopa Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeReal Estate, Commercial Law, Property Law, Real Estate Development, Trial Practice, Real Estate Lending Law. Firm Size: 2
AddressSGA Corporate Center
16100 N. 71st Street, Suite 190
Scottsdale, AZ 85254, (Maricopa Co.)
PhonePhone: 480-483-6336
Fax: 480-483-6337
Website
http://www.azlawpartner.com
E. J. Peskind (Member) born Belleville, Illinois, June 6, 1943; admitted to bar, 1968, Illinois and Missouri; 1969, Alaska; 1971, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 1972, Arizona, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1973, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Illinois (B.S., with honors, 1965); University of Michigan (J.D., cum laude, 1968). Omicron Delta Kappa; Beta Gamma Sigma; Phi Eta Sigma; Phi Delta Phi. Author: "Regulation of the Financial Press: A New Dimension to Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5," 14 St. Louis University Law Journal 80, 1969; "Building Houses and Building Cases," 32 Arizona Attorney, January 1996; "Strategic Public Relations A Marketing Tool for All Law Firms," 34 Arizona Attorney, May 1998. Member: American, Illinois State and Alaska Bar Associations; State Bar of Arizona (Past-Chairman, Law Practice Management Section); The Missouri Bar. Practice Areas: Litigation; Real Estate-Commercial Law; Real Estate (Property) Law; Real Estate Development; Trial Practice.Email: E. J. Peskind
Richard K. Walker (Partner) born Knoxville, Tennessee, October 21, 1948; admitted to bar, 1975, Arizona; 1977, District of Columbia and U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Kansas (B.A., with honors, 1970; J.D., 1975); Universität Bonn, Bonn, West Germany; Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, West Germany. Fulbright Direct Exchange Scholar. Articles Editor, Kansas Law Review, 1974-1975. Assistant Professor of Law, 1977-1981 and Associate Professor of Law, 1981-1982, University of South Carolina. Member: American Bar Association (Member: Litigation Section, Committees: Employment & Labor Relations Law; Class Actions & Derivative Suits; Trial Practice, 1979; Management Member, Labor & Employment Law Section, Committees: Equal Employment Opportunity Law; Development of the Law Under the NLRA; Practice and Procedure Under the NLRA, 1979); Arizona Association of Defense Counsel (Member, Board of Directors, 1997-2000). Reported Cases: Marino v. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301 (1988); Macktal v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, 171 F.3d 323 (5th Cir. 1999); Pacific & Arctic Ry. and Nav. Co. v. United Transportation Union, 952 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1991); Hispanic Soc'y of New York City Police Dept., 806 F.2d 1147 (2d Cir. 1986); Dunham v. Brock, 794 F. 2d 1037 (5th Cir. 1986); Brown & Root, Inc. v. Donovan, 747 F.2d 1029 (5th Cir. 1984); Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of Dallas, 723 F.2d 650 (5th Cir. 1984); Ofodu v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., 98 F. Supp.2d 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2000); Zhang v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., 2000 WL 565185 (S.D.N.Y. 2000); Edison Electic Institute v. Henwood, 832 F.Supp. 413 (D.D.C. 1993); Guardians Ass'n of New York City Police Dept. v. Civil Service Comm'n of City of New York, 527 F.Supp. 751 (S.D.N.Y. 1981); Granite Construction Co., 330 N.L.R.B. 205 (1999). Languages: German. Practice Areas: Litigation; Employment Discrimination Law; Labor Law; Government Investigations; Class Actions; Collective Bargaining; Whistleblower Litigation; Executive Employment Law; Sexual Harassment.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|