|
|
Address
3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 1800
Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (Maricopa Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.4
out of 5
This video requires flash.
Close
(Main Office) Statement of PracticePersonal Injury Litigation, Criminal Defense, Felonies, Misdemeanors, Appellate Practice, Civil Rights Litigation, Employment Litigation, Civil Litigation. Firm Size: 1
Jess A. Lorona (Member) born Phoenix, Arizona, October 5, 1957; admitted to bar, 1983; Arizona and U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; 1987, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 2007, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: Arizona State University (B.S., Criminal Justice, cum laude, 1979); Arizona State University (J.D., 1982). Lecturer: "Ethics in Criminal Procedure," San Antonio Bar Association's 38th Annual Criminal Law Institute, 2001; "Ethics," Federal Public Defenders of Idaho and Washington, Spokane, Washington, 2002; "The Practice of Ethics," National Continuing Legal Education Conference, Criminal Conference, Snowmass Village, Colorado, 2003. Participant, State v., ABC's five-part documentary series on the legal system. Frequent Speaker, Topics of Ethics and Trial Advocacy, State Bar of Arizona Course on Professionalism. Faculty Member, Arizona College of Trial Advocacy. Member: Maricopa County Bar Association; State Bar of Arizona; National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers; Arizona Trial Lawyers Association; Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice; Los Abogados Hispanic Bar Association. (Also Member, Lorona, Steiner, Ducar, Coughlin & Horowitz, PLLC). Reported Cases: State v. Fernandez, 169 P.3d 641 (Ariz. App. 2007); Rudebush v. State of Arizona, Northern Arizona University, 3:95-CV-1313 (2006); Beaty v. Stewart, 303 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2002); U.S. v. Tidwell, 191 F.3d 976 (1999); Stefanow v. McFadden, 103 F.3d 1466 (1996); U.S. v. Marulanda, 972 F.2d 1345 (C.A.9 (Ariz.), 1992); State v. Vickers, 768 P.2d 1177, 159 Ariz. 532 (1989). Practice Areas: Personal Injury Litigation; Criminal Defense; Felonies; Misdemeanors; Appellate Practice; Civil Rights Litigation; Employment Litigation; Civil Litigation.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|