|
|
Address
32971 N. 70th Street
Scottsdale, Arizona 85266 (Maricopa Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation (Main Office) My firm practice focuses on estate planning, including the preparation of trusts and wills, and personal injury and accident cases, wrongful death, and medical malpractice. My practice is not limited exclusively to these areas of law. I have a broad background in many other areas of law, including, for example, insurance and health law, ERISA claims, water law, and Indian law. I am a solo practitioner. I have practiced law in Arizona since 1967. My professional experience has included litigation of all kinds. I am available for a free initial consultation. Statement of PracticeEstate Planning, Trusts and Wills, Probate, Personal Injury, Tort, Automobile Accidents, Car Accidents, Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death, Indian Law, Health Law, ERISA Law, Water Law, Commercial Litigation, Planned Community Law and Commercial Transactions. Firm Size: 1
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Address32971 N. 70th Street
Scottsdale, AZ 85266, (Maricopa Co.)
PhonePhone: 480-220-1880
Fax: 480-488-9446
Website
http://www.johnryley.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Saturday: By Appointment Only
Sunday: By Appointment Only
John H. Ryley (Attorney) born Phoenix, Arizona, October 11, 1942; admitted to bar, 1967, Arizona; 1968, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; 1984, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 2000, U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Education: Cornell University (B.A., 1964); University of Arizona (J.D., 1967). Mediation Participant, Mediation Training and Mediation Program sponsored by the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office and Arizona Attorney General and serving as a volunteer mediator in the Arizona Courts. Shareholder, Sparks, Tehan & Ryley, P.C. (renamed The Sparks Law Firm, P.C.), 1980-1990. With Ryley, Carlock, and Applewhite, Phoenix, Arizona, 1967-1969 and 1972-1976. Assistant Attorney General, State of Arizona, 1969-1971. Past Member, Board of Directors, Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest. Member, Board of Directors, Scottsdale Foothills Rotary Club. Special Assistant Attorney General, State of Arizona Representing the Risk Management Division, 1980-1990. Juvenile Court Referee, Maricopa County Superior Court. Public Defender, Felony Cases, Maricopa County Superior Court Appointed, 1980-1990. Member: San Carlos Apache Tribal Bar Association (Member, Board of Directors); State Bar of Arizona. Reported Cases: Burns v. Jacquays Mining Corporation, 752 P.2d 28 (Ariz. App.1987); Fuenning v. Super. Ct. In & For Cty. of Maricopa, 680 P.2d 121 (Ariz. 1983); Campbell v. Superior Court, 479 P.2d 685 (Ariz. 1971); The General Adjudication of All Rights To Use Water in the Gila River System and Source, 127 P.3d 882 (2006) (res judicata issues); The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Source, 35 P.3d 68 (Ariz. 2001); The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Source, 9 P.3d 1069 (Ariz. 2000) ("subflow" v. groundwater); The San Carlos Apache Tribe v. The Superior Court of Arizona, 972 P.2d 179 (Ariz. 1999); The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Source, 989 P.2d 739 (Ariz. 1999); The San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Hon. Susan R. Bolton, 977 P.2d 790 (Ariz. 1999); United States of America v. Gila River Indian Community, 920 F. Supp.1444 (D. Ariz. 1996); United States of America v. Gila River Indian Community, 804 F. Supp. 1 (Ariz. 1992); United States of America v. Gila Valley Irrigation District, 117 F.3d 425 (9th Cir.1997); United States of America v. Gila Valley Irrigation District, 31 F.3d 1428 (9th Cir. 1994); San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States of America, 272 F. Supp.2d 860 (D. Ariz. 2003); Catholic Healthcare West Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, San Carlos Apache Tribal Court of Appeals, Case No. A-02-CV-97-101 (2003); Phelps Dodge Corporation Verde Valley Ranch Development, Environmental Appeals Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NPDES Appeal No. 01-07, decided May 21, 2002 (2002 EPA App. LEXIS 8); Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. v. Bruce Babbitt, 51 F.3d 199 (9th Cir. 1995); Burns v. Jacquays Mining Corporation, 752 P.2d 28 (Ariz. App.1987); Sherman v. Bruce Babbitt, 772 F.2d 1476 (9th Cir. 1985); Baumann v. Arizona Department of Corrections, 754 F.2d 841 (9th Cir. 1985); Burrington v. Gila County, 767 P.2d 43 (Ariz. App.1988); Berry v. State of Arizona, 724 P.2d 1262 (Ariz. App. 1986); Fox v. Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles, 717 P.2d 476 (Ariz. App.1986); Fuenning v. Super. Ct. In & For Cty. of Maricopa, 680 P.2d 121 (Ariz. 1983); State v. Miller, 497 P.2d 516 (Ariz. 1972); Campbell v. Superior Court, 479 P.2d 685 (Ariz. 1971). Practice Areas: Personal Injury; Estate Planning; Trusts and Wills; Probate; Wrongful Death; Medical Malpractice; Commercial Litigation; Natural Resources Law; Indian Affairs Law; Environmental Law; Water Rights; Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|